Subscribe To Blame It On Vanity
Posts
All Comments
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Thursday, January 5, 2012
What is a young adult in the 2000's?
Ok so recently I checked out the new Charlize Theron movie Young Adult and it left me asking the ? What exactly is a young adult???in 2012...
I decided to do some research and devide this topic into 4 parts so here is what i found to be the case of so many"young adults"
Lets start with Characteristics of 18-23 years of age:
1. Trial and error
2. Short attention span (easily accessible)
3. Impatient
4. Independent
5. Beginning/training for jobs or careers
6. No kids
7. Low income
8. Lots of roommates or living with parents
9. Lots of free time for social needs or service
10. Lots of work—college classes, jobs (more than one part-time or long hours at
a full-time job) overwhelmed with responsibilities
11. Some will experience unplanned pregnancies that lead to child support and
child care issues
12. Want authenticity from those in leadership positions
13. Gothic influence
14. Exploratory—Spiritual, identity, relationship
15. Want to be loved
16. Identity development—in relationship to something of value
17. Relationship development—friends and marriage.
18. Scared of Commitment—some seeking for love that leads to early marriages
19. Need for community to be connected and included
20. Want to be trained to share their faith
21. Intimacy development
So thats pt 1...Thoughts?
Im back from the dead!!!
Sorry ive been gone to long but that's all changing this year...
I look foward to raising your eyebrows so high you'll be left looking like Joan Rivers!!!
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Obama will not back gay marriage ban!!!
A key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutionally biased and will no longer be defended in court by Justice Department attorneys, Attorney General Eric Holder announced Wednesday.
But he assured members of Congress that the Clinton-era federal statute, which defines marriage as between only a "man and a woman" as "husband and wife," will continue to be enforced by the executive branch until it is either repealed by legislators or definitely voided by the courts. Section 3 of the statute, which limits the definition of marriage to opposite-sex partners, precludes spouses in same-sex marriages from receiving certain federal benefits to which spouses in traditional marriages are entitled.
Until now, federal attorneys have defended the validity of Section 3 in court as a legitimate expression of congressional authority. But President Obama himself ordered the reversal of executive branch policy and position after determining that the marriage classifications contained in the statute could not survive under the strictest standards of judicial review. "I fully concur" with that decision, Holder said in the statement issued in connection with two pending federal challenges to the DOMA in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In announcing the surprise move, Holder noted that Obama had "concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny," which Section 3 of the Marriage Act could not meet. Consequently, the attorney general wrote, the Department of Justice will not defend the constitutionality of Section 3 as applied to same-sex married couples in the two cases filed in the 2nd Circuit. "We will, however, remain parties to the cases and continue to represent the interests of the United States throughout the litigation," he said.
The fate of the Marriage Act will in turn determine the fate of other federal policies and practices. For example, even after the Pentagon ends its controversial "Don't ask, don't tell" termination policy, which excludes openly gay military service members, the same-sex spouses of soldiers would not receive the same benefits as the opposite-sex spouses of soldiers -- unless DOMA were repealed or struck down by the federal courts. In July, a noted federal trial judge in Massachusetts, a Nixon appointee, declared Section 3 unconstitutional. That case is now before the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The attorney general also informed Congress of the change in policy "so Members who wish to defend the statute may pursue that option. The Department will also work closely with the courts to ensure that Congress has a full and fair opportunity to participate in pending litigation." And it is likely that legislators will take the Justice Department up on its offer as they seek to defend the law, which was enacted in part to prevent the recognition and spread of same-sex marriage among the states. Currently, five states and the District of Columbia recognize the validity of same-sex marriage. The issue in California is on appeal.
A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner said that "the president will have to explain why he thinks now is the appropriate time to stir up a controversial issue that sharply divides the nation," particularly at a time when "Americans want Washington to focus on creating jobs and cutting spending."
Supporters of same-sex marriage were heartened by the decision. The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, was quick to praise President Obama's step. "DOMA unfairly discriminates against Americans and we applaud [the president] for fulfilling his oath to defend critical constitutional principles," said HRC President Joe Solmonese.
But he assured members of Congress that the Clinton-era federal statute, which defines marriage as between only a "man and a woman" as "husband and wife," will continue to be enforced by the executive branch until it is either repealed by legislators or definitely voided by the courts. Section 3 of the statute, which limits the definition of marriage to opposite-sex partners, precludes spouses in same-sex marriages from receiving certain federal benefits to which spouses in traditional marriages are entitled.
Until now, federal attorneys have defended the validity of Section 3 in court as a legitimate expression of congressional authority. But President Obama himself ordered the reversal of executive branch policy and position after determining that the marriage classifications contained in the statute could not survive under the strictest standards of judicial review. "I fully concur" with that decision, Holder said in the statement issued in connection with two pending federal challenges to the DOMA in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In announcing the surprise move, Holder noted that Obama had "concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny," which Section 3 of the Marriage Act could not meet. Consequently, the attorney general wrote, the Department of Justice will not defend the constitutionality of Section 3 as applied to same-sex married couples in the two cases filed in the 2nd Circuit. "We will, however, remain parties to the cases and continue to represent the interests of the United States throughout the litigation," he said.
The fate of the Marriage Act will in turn determine the fate of other federal policies and practices. For example, even after the Pentagon ends its controversial "Don't ask, don't tell" termination policy, which excludes openly gay military service members, the same-sex spouses of soldiers would not receive the same benefits as the opposite-sex spouses of soldiers -- unless DOMA were repealed or struck down by the federal courts. In July, a noted federal trial judge in Massachusetts, a Nixon appointee, declared Section 3 unconstitutional. That case is now before the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The attorney general also informed Congress of the change in policy "so Members who wish to defend the statute may pursue that option. The Department will also work closely with the courts to ensure that Congress has a full and fair opportunity to participate in pending litigation." And it is likely that legislators will take the Justice Department up on its offer as they seek to defend the law, which was enacted in part to prevent the recognition and spread of same-sex marriage among the states. Currently, five states and the District of Columbia recognize the validity of same-sex marriage. The issue in California is on appeal.
A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner said that "the president will have to explain why he thinks now is the appropriate time to stir up a controversial issue that sharply divides the nation," particularly at a time when "Americans want Washington to focus on creating jobs and cutting spending."
Supporters of same-sex marriage were heartened by the decision. The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, was quick to praise President Obama's step. "DOMA unfairly discriminates against Americans and we applaud [the president] for fulfilling his oath to defend critical constitutional principles," said HRC President Joe Solmonese.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Happy Valentine all!!!
Im so close to you baby
But I'm so far away
There's a silence between us
And there's so much to say
You're my strength, you're my weakness
You're my faith, you're my doubt
We gotta meet in the middle
To work this thing out
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
We're afraid to be idle
So we fill up the days
We run on the treadmill
Keep slavin' away 'til there's no time for talkin'
About trouble in mind
And the doors are all closed
Between your heart and mine
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
Just look out around us
People fightin' their wars
They think they'll be happy
When they've settled their scores
Let's lay down our weapons
That hold us apart
Be still for just a minute
Try to open our hearts
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
But I'm so far away
There's a silence between us
And there's so much to say
You're my strength, you're my weakness
You're my faith, you're my doubt
We gotta meet in the middle
To work this thing out
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
We're afraid to be idle
So we fill up the days
We run on the treadmill
Keep slavin' away 'til there's no time for talkin'
About trouble in mind
And the doors are all closed
Between your heart and mine
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
Just look out around us
People fightin' their wars
They think they'll be happy
When they've settled their scores
Let's lay down our weapons
That hold us apart
Be still for just a minute
Try to open our hearts
More love, I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
I can hear our hearts cryin'
More love, I know that's all we need
More love, to flow in between us
To take us and hold us and lift us above
If there's ever an answer
It's more love
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)